Power
Grid supply and electricity cost for facilities already running: what changed, what the figure measures, and the question it raises for your site.
What changed this week
Nothing new yet this week (12–18 October 2026). Latest changes, 21–27 September 2026:
- New Guide: Powering the next MW
- Update Power prices by state updated to July 2026 data (EIA, preliminary)
- New PJM 2028/29 capacity auction: 6,831 MW below the reliability requirement
- New Average commercial and industrial electricity prices, January–June 2026 (EIA, preliminary)
- Correction PJM signal corrected: per-MW-year figure removed; peak load contribution and capacity obligation distinguished
- New Power prices by state: 50 states and DC, June 2026 (EIA, preliminary)
Adding 1–5 MW at an existing site? Powering the next MW: seven paths, with dated sources and the gaps.
Electricity cost · updated monthly
Power prices by state
Latest data: July 2026 · Compared with: July 2025 · Released: 24 September 2026 · Status: preliminary
United States · July 2026 compared with July 2025 · preliminary
- Commercial +3.4% 14.53¢ per kWh, from 14.05¢
- Industrial +4.7% 9.77¢ per kWh, from 9.33¢
- Year to date (January–July): commercial +5.6%, industrial +5.9%
These are national averages for all commercial or all industrial customers. They are not any facility's rate or bill: compare your own rate class and supply contract.
Largest measured movements, July 2026 compared with July 2025
Percentage change in each state's average price for the sector. Ranked by the size of the change, not by price. EIA's figures do not say why prices moved, and DCU does not attribute a cause.
Commercial
Largest increases
- +24.4%
- +22.3%
- +15.7%
- +15.4%
- +14.4%
Largest decreases
- −13.1%
- −5.5%
- −5.3%
- −4.5%
- −4.3%
Industrial
Largest increases
- +59.1%
- +29.8%
- +27.9%
- +21.4%
- +21.0%
Largest decreases
- −27.5%
- −12.0%
- −11.3%
- −7.7%
- −7.0%
All 50 states and DC
| Cents per kWh, July 2026 | Commercial | vs 2025 | Industrial | vs 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alabama | 14.83¢ | +1.6% | 8.42¢ | +3.7% |
| Alaska | 23.29¢ | +1.3% | 24.81¢ | +27.9% |
| Arizona | 13.12¢ | −2.2% | 9.35¢ | +0.9% |
| Arkansas | 11.76¢ | +10.8% | 7.84¢ | +8.3% |
| California | 30.56¢ | +1.6% | 25.11¢ | −0.6% |
| Colorado | 13.81¢ | +4.2% | 9.54¢ | +0.1% |
| Connecticut | 19.87¢ | −13.1% | 17.29¢ | −7.0% |
| Delaware | 13.80¢ | +10.0% | 11.71¢ | +5.6% |
| District of Columbia | 23.88¢ | +15.4% | 32.15¢ | +59.1% |
| Florida | 11.37¢ | +0.6% | 9.17¢ | +2.9% |
| Georgia | 12.54¢ | +0.4% | 10.03¢ | −7.7% |
| Hawaii | 43.63¢ | +24.4% | 39.33¢ | +29.8% |
| Idaho | 10.16¢ | +5.9% | 9.02¢ | +9.5% |
| Illinois | 15.19¢ | +11.2% | 11.87¢ | +11.6% |
| Indiana | 13.30¢ | −5.5% | 9.16¢ | −0.5% |
| Iowa | 13.27¢ | +0.7% | 9.99¢ | +10.1% |
| Kansas | 12.04¢ | +3.1% | 8.52¢ | +5.6% |
| Kentucky | 11.95¢ | +2.7% | 7.51¢ | +2.7% |
| Louisiana | 10.97¢ | −5.3% | 6.08¢ | −12.0% |
| Maine | 21.64¢ | +2.7% | 13.94¢ | −11.3% |
| Maryland | 17.51¢ | +15.7% | 16.21¢ | +18.7% |
| Massachusetts | 24.41¢ | +4.9% | 20.25¢ | +1.6% |
| Michigan | 16.46¢ | +10.0% | 9.81¢ | +9.7% |
| Minnesota | 13.49¢ | +2.4% | 10.34¢ | +5.8% |
| Mississippi | 13.65¢ | +7.2% | 7.66¢ | +0.7% |
| Missouri | 12.64¢ | +3.5% | 9.87¢ | +4.3% |
| Montana | 13.33¢ | +3.9% | 7.71¢ | 0.0% |
| Nebraska | 9.39¢ | −1.9% | 10.00¢ | +11.1% |
| Nevada | 9.72¢ | −4.1% | 10.04¢ | +2.1% |
| New Hampshire | 20.63¢ | +4.5% | 18.17¢ | +8.5% |
| New Jersey | 19.17¢ | +4.4% | 15.63¢ | +4.8% |
| New Mexico | 11.90¢ | −4.5% | 4.16¢ | −27.5% |
| New York | 24.18¢ | +4.9% | 10.81¢ | +7.5% |
| North Carolina | 10.73¢ | +10.1% | 8.37¢ | +7.7% |
| North Dakota | 8.22¢ | +5.5% | 8.21¢ | +7.7% |
| Ohio | 14.06¢ | +22.3% | 10.95¢ | +21.0% |
| Oklahoma | 10.32¢ | +4.0% | 8.16¢ | +21.4% |
| Oregon | 10.60¢ | +0.1% | 8.92¢ | +3.8% |
| Pennsylvania | 13.86¢ | +9.7% | 11.04¢ | +11.9% |
| Rhode Island | 23.43¢ | +5.4% | 22.86¢ | +7.3% |
| South Carolina | 11.61¢ | +5.8% | 7.84¢ | −0.5% |
| South Dakota | 12.17¢ | +3.8% | 9.83¢ | +5.4% |
| Tennessee | 13.43¢ | +4.8% | 7.13¢ | −1.5% |
| Texas | 8.47¢ | −4.3% | 7.07¢ | +7.0% |
| Utah | 10.85¢ | +3.9% | 9.10¢ | −3.2% |
| Vermont | 20.71¢ | +6.8% | 13.07¢ | +6.9% |
| Virginia | 11.68¢ | +14.4% | 10.07¢ | +3.8% |
| Washington | 11.78¢ | +4.8% | 7.51¢ | +4.2% |
| West Virginia | 11.44¢ | +2.2% | 8.40¢ | +5.3% |
| Wisconsin | 13.93¢ | +4.2% | 10.46¢ | +6.1% |
| Wyoming | 10.26¢ | +1.0% | 8.62¢ | −3.5% |
| U.S. average | 14.53¢ | +3.4% | 9.77¢ | +4.7% |
Government source. U.S. Energy Information Administration, Electric Power Monthly, Table 5.6.A (latest month) and Table 5.6.B (year to date), data for July 2026, released 24 September 2026. Preliminary estimates, revised in later editions. Ranks are among 51 jurisdictions: the 50 states and DC.
Grid supply · PJM region, including Virginia and Ohio
The PJM grid secured less capacity than its reliability requirement for 2028/29
Delivery year: 2028/29 · Auction results: 14 July 2026 · Second auction in a row below requirement
- 6,831 MWbelow PJM's reliability requirement (unforced capacity). Previous auction: 6,516 MW.
- 14.7%estimated total reserve margin, against a 20% target
- $325.00per MW-day: the 2028/29 wholesale auction clearing price, at the cap. A market result, not a facility bill.
PJM runs this auction to secure enough generation, and demand that can be reduced, for a future year. For 2028/29 it secured 149,182 MW of unforced capacity, a rating that discounts each resource for how reliably it can deliver. That was 6,831 MW short of the 156,013 MW requirement. PJM says the shortfall "does not necessarily mean that the PJM system will be unable to serve load reliably", but that it "would have to operate with slimmer reserves and greater level of risk."
Two reserve margins appear in the report. 14.7% is PJM's estimate for the whole region, counting capacity bought in the auction and capacity that some utilities commit from their own resources. 14.4% counts the auction alone. Both are below the 20% target, which PJM sets to hold the expected loss of load to one day in ten years.
This is the second auction in a row to clear more than one percentage point below that target. PJM's report says its current tariff provides for a separate Reliability Backstop Auction if three consecutive auctions do so. The report describes changes to those backstop rules as work in PJM's stakeholder process, not as approved rules.
Wholesale auction clearing price, $ per MW-day
| 2024/25 | 2025/26 | 2026/27 | 2027/28 | 2028/29 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| $28.92 | $269.92 | $329.17 | $333.44 | $325.00 |
| Delivery year | $ per MW-day |
|---|---|
| 2024/25 | $28.92 |
| 2025/26 | $269.92 |
| 2026/27 | $329.17 |
| 2027/28 | $333.44 |
| 2028/29 | $325.00 |
Region-wide wholesale clearing prices for each delivery year, as listed in PJM's 2028/29 report. The 2027/28 and 2028/29 auctions both cleared at their price caps. These are market results, not facility bills: PJM notes that its auction totals do not equal the cost to customers, because load whose supply is hedged is not exposed to the clearing price.
The question for an existing facility in PJM:
What is our peak load contribution, how is it calculated in our utility zone, and how do capacity
charges reach our bill under our supply arrangement?
PJM's capacity manual separates two things. Your local utility assigns each customer a peak load contribution: a share of the zone's weather-normalized peak from the previous summer, set before each delivery year. The capacity obligation belongs to whoever serves your load, your utility or your supplier: it is the sum of its customers' peak load contributions, scaled by zonal and PJM-wide factors. Neither is the same as your facility's rated MW.
How peak load contributions are calculated varies by utility zone. How capacity charges reach your bill depends on how you buy power: default service from your utility, a contract with a competitive supplier (with capacity cost passed through, fixed, or bundled into the price), or a utility that supplies its own capacity. Your utility or supplier can tell you which applies.
Correction, 24 September 2026. We removed a per-MW-year figure calculated from the auction clearing price, which could be read as a facility cost, and rewrote the facility question to separate a customer's peak load contribution from its supplier's capacity obligation. We also described PJM's backstop rule changes as proposals.
Grid operator source. PJM Interconnection, 2028/2029 Base Residual Auction Report (PDF), 14 July 2026, pages 3–5; and PJM Manual 18: PJM Capacity Market (PDF), Revision 62, effective 17 December 2025, sections 7.4–7.5.